Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Actas dermo-sifiliogr. (Ed. impr.) ; 115(3): 280-287, Mar. 2024. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-231403

RESUMO

El desarrollo y comercialización de los sensores de glucosa y las bombas de insulina han supuesto una revolución en el control de los pacientes diabéticos. En los últimos años se han detectado múltiples casos de dermatitis de contacto relacionados con estos dispositivos médicos, con el creciente interés sobre los alérgenos responsables de la sensibilización. Isobornil acrilato fue sin duda el alérgeno principal del dispositivo FreeStyle, motivando al fabricante a modificar la composición eliminando este alérgeno. Curiosamente, este alérgeno está presente en casi todos los sensores comercializados. La colofonia y derivados del ácido abiético desempeñan un papel relevante en cuanto al adhesivo. Recientemente aparecen nuevos componentes identificados como alérgenos, no comercializadas, como el dipropilene glicol diacrilato, la N,N-dimetilacrilamida, o el metacrilato de trietilenglicol, que están siendo foco de estudio. El impacto positivo que tiene el uso de estos dispositivos puede verse mermado por la sensibilización a uno de sus ingredientes, obligando en ocasiones a abandonar el dispositivo, y por ende, restando calidad de vida. El dermatólogo debe posicionarse respecto al estudio dirigido de estos pacientes, dando soporte a los servicios de endocrinología, con la finalidad de orientar tanto el cuidado de la piel como las alternativas posibles, especialmente con la colaboración de los fabricantes.(AU)


The development and commercialization of glucose sensors and insulin pumps has revolutionized the management of diabetes. These devices have been linked to multiple cases of contact dermatitis in recent years, however, giving rise to a growing interest in identifying the sensitizing allergens. Isobornyl acrylate was clearly identified as one of the main allergens responsible for contact dermatitis among users of the FreeStyle glucose sensor and was subsequently removed from the product ingredients. Remarkably, however, it is still used in most other sensors on the market. The common adhesive ingredients colophony and abietic acid derivatives have also been shown to be sensitizing agents. New components under study, such as dipropylene glycol diacrylate, N,N-dimethylacrylamide, and triethylene glycol methacrylate have recently been identified as allergens, though they are not commercially available for clinical testing. The benefits offered by glucose sensors and insulin pumps may be offset by sensitization to product ingredients, in some cases forcing discontinuation and diminishing quality of life. Dermatologists should play a role in this clinical and research scenario, offering case-by-case guidance to endocrinologists on skin care and possible alternatives for patients with glucose sensors and insulin pumps who develop contact dermatitis. They should also collaborate with the manufacturers developing these devices.(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Diabetes Mellitus , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/prevenção & controle , Sistemas de Infusão de Insulina , /métodos , Equipamentos e Provisões , Testes do Emplastro
2.
Actas dermo-sifiliogr. (Ed. impr.) ; 115(3): T280-T287, Mar. 2024. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-231404

RESUMO

El desarrollo y comercialización de los sensores de glucosa y las bombas de insulina han supuesto una revolución en el control de los pacientes diabéticos. En los últimos años se han detectado múltiples casos de dermatitis de contacto relacionados con estos dispositivos médicos, con el creciente interés sobre los alérgenos responsables de la sensibilización. Isobornil acrilato fue sin duda el alérgeno principal del dispositivo FreeStyle, motivando al fabricante a modificar la composición eliminando este alérgeno. Curiosamente, este alérgeno está presente en casi todos los sensores comercializados. La colofonia y derivados del ácido abiético desempeñan un papel relevante en cuanto al adhesivo. Recientemente aparecen nuevos componentes identificados como alérgenos, no comercializadas, como el dipropilene glicol diacrilato, la N,N-dimetilacrilamida, o el metacrilato de trietilenglicol, que están siendo foco de estudio. El impacto positivo que tiene el uso de estos dispositivos puede verse mermado por la sensibilización a uno de sus ingredientes, obligando en ocasiones a abandonar el dispositivo, y por ende, restando calidad de vida. El dermatólogo debe posicionarse respecto al estudio dirigido de estos pacientes, dando soporte a los servicios de endocrinología, con la finalidad de orientar tanto el cuidado de la piel como las alternativas posibles, especialmente con la colaboración de los fabricantes.(AU)


The development and commercialization of glucose sensors and insulin pumps has revolutionized the management of diabetes. These devices have been linked to multiple cases of contact dermatitis in recent years, however, giving rise to a growing interest in identifying the sensitizing allergens. Isobornyl acrylate was clearly identified as one of the main allergens responsible for contact dermatitis among users of the FreeStyle glucose sensor and was subsequently removed from the product ingredients. Remarkably, however, it is still used in most other sensors on the market. The common adhesive ingredients colophony and abietic acid derivatives have also been shown to be sensitizing agents. New components under study, such as dipropylene glycol diacrylate, N,N-dimethylacrylamide, and triethylene glycol methacrylate have recently been identified as allergens, though they are not commercially available for clinical testing. The benefits offered by glucose sensors and insulin pumps may be offset by sensitization to product ingredients, in some cases forcing discontinuation and diminishing quality of life. Dermatologists should play a role in this clinical and research scenario, offering case-by-case guidance to endocrinologists on skin care and possible alternatives for patients with glucose sensors and insulin pumps who develop contact dermatitis. They should also collaborate with the manufacturers developing these devices.(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Diabetes Mellitus , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/prevenção & controle , Sistemas de Infusão de Insulina , /métodos , Equipamentos e Provisões , Testes do Emplastro
3.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 115(3): T280-T287, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38242434

RESUMO

The development and commercialization of glucose sensors and insulin pumps has revolutionized the management of diabetes. These devices have been linked to multiple cases of contact dermatitis in recent years, however, giving rise to a growing interest in identifying the sensitizing allergens. Isobornyl acrylate was clearly identified as one of the main allergens responsible for contact dermatitis among users of the FreeStyle glucose sensor and was subsequently removed from the product ingredients. Remarkably, however, it is still used in most other sensors on the market. The common adhesive ingredients colophony and abietic acid derivatives have also been shown to be sensitizing agents. New components under study, such as dipropylene glycol diacrylate, N,N-dimethylacrylamide, and triethylene glycol methacrylate have recently been identified as allergens, though they are not commercially available for clinical testing. The benefits offered by glucose sensors and insulin pumps may be offset by sensitization to product ingredients, in some cases forcing discontinuation and diminishing quality of life. Dermatologists should play a role in this clinical and research scenario, offering case-by-case guidance to endocrinologists on skin care and possible alternatives for patients with glucose sensors and insulin pumps who develop contact dermatitis. They should also collaborate with the manufacturers developing these devices.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Diabetes Mellitus , Insulinas , Humanos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Automonitorização da Glicemia , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Acrilatos/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos , Glucose , Testes do Emplastro
4.
Rev. chil. endocrinol. diabetes ; 15(1): 29-34, 2022. ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1359364

RESUMO

Los cuidados actuales de la diabetes incluyen altos niveles de tecnología y los pacientes utilizan diferentes dispositivos que pueden ayudar en su control metabólico, pero pueden impactar negativamente en su piel. Sensores de glucosa como el Freestyle, Dexcom, el Enlite de Medtronic y los sistemas de infusión continua de insulina contienen diferentes productos químicos que están en contacto directo con la piel del paciente y pueden causar una dermatitis irritativa o de contacto alérgica. Las lesiones incluyen eczema, prurito, heridas, cicatrices y cambios en la pigmentación de la piel. Los productos químicos involucrados que pueden ocasionarlas son el isobornil acrilato, N, N- dimetilacrilamida, etil cianoacrilato y colophonium, forzando a los pacientes a cambiar los sitios de infusión, el set de infusión o el sensor mismo más pronto de lo esperado, para reducir el nivel de daño en la piel. Existe gran número de productos que permiten proteger la piel y reducir el contacto de la piel con la cánula de la bomba o el sensor. Para reducir o prevenir el daño existen productos como cremas o spray y parches de hidrocoloide que actúan como barrera y existen técnicas para aplicar y retirar cuidadosamente los parches y adhesivos de los dispositivos. Una vez que las lesiones se han producido, el tratamiento incluye pomadas y a veces corticoides tópicos y/o antibióticos. Para prevenir o reducir el daño de la piel asociado al sensor y uso de la bomba de insulina, la industria que los produce debería incluir la información en relación a los productos químicos incluidos en cada dispositivo.


Diabetes care nowadays includes a high level of technology and patients use different devices which can help them in their glycemic control, but can have a negative impact on their skin. Glucose sensors such as Freestyle, Dexcom, Medtronic Enlite and also continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion systems contain different chemical products which are in direct contact with the patient's skin and can cause irritative or allergic contact dermatitis. Lesions include eczema, pruritus, wounds, scars and changes in skin pigmentation. The chemical products which can induce them are isobornyl acrylate, N, N- dimethylacrylamide, ethyl cyanoacrylate and colophonium, forcing patients to change the infusion site, set or the sensor itself, earlier than expected, in order to reduce the level of skin damage. There are a number of products which can protect the skin and reduce it's contact with the pump cannula or the sensor. To reduce or prevent damage, we have products such as barrier cream or spray films and hydrocolloid blister plasters and actions such as careful application and removal of device's patches and adhesives. Once lesions are established, treatment includes ointments and sometimes topical steroids and/ or antibiotics. In order to prevent or reduce skin damage related to sensor and insulin pump use, the manufacturers should include the information related to the chemicals included in each device.


Assuntos
Humanos , Dermatopatias/etiologia , Sistemas de Infusão de Insulina/efeitos adversos , Pele/lesões , Automonitorização da Glicemia/efeitos adversos , Adesivos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Controle Glicêmico/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...